The Threat

PEDOPHILE HUSBAND

The man we call pedophile husband [Proof 0], not his real name, was born in Hamilton (Ontario) Canada and, as of December 24, 2019, was 37 years old. When not in jail, or being held in various psychiatric institutions, he lives in a small town in Southern Ontario, approximately two hours from Toronto. He resides with the biological mother, to whom he is now married, their young child together, who cannot be identified, and occasionally, his two teenage sons from a prior relationship.

He does not work. He is a disability pension recipient and sells taxidermy (dead animals mounted on wood plaques) on Kijiji for cash, illegally. He is active in the drug trade. They reside in a tiny (~750 sq. ft.) shack, owned by his parents, who can also not be named here, rented to him for cheap.

VIOLENT CRIMINAL HISTORY

The pedophile husband has a lengthy and violent criminal history [Proof 1]. He has also been arrested for psychiatric evaluations [Proof 2]. He has been put on "peace bonds," sentenced to probation, ordered into in-custody psychiatric care, and imprisoned [Proof 3].

He is homicidal, suicidal and has been diagnosed with a multiplicity of serious and frightening emotional defects, including antisocial and borderline personality disorders, social anxiety disorders, cluster-b personality traits, narcissism, black-out rage and a whole host of others.  He is a heavy user of drugs and alcohol [Proof 4].

The biological mother knew all of this and more. His instability and sexual deviance. His being a predicate abuser, his addiction issues, anger issues, and recidivism. His obsession with weapons, his history of killing animals and setting fires. She visited him while he was incarcerated at a psychiatric facility. She knew all about it [Proof 4]. She knew, yet she still introduced those two young girls to that environment, secretly so their father (Superdad) wouldn't find out.

POLICE FAILURES

When Superdad learned the truth, he set out to protect his girls. He obtained judicial orders that read ”THE CHILDREN SHALL NOT BE LEFT UNSUPERVISED WITH [the pedophile husband]" [Proof 5], then another order that read ”[the biological mother] SHALL ENSURE THAT [the pedophile husband] IS NOT PRESENT OR IN CONTACT WITH THE CHILDREN DURING ACCESS” [Proof 6] and one that read ”AT NO TIME SHALL [the pedophile husband] BE LEFT ALONE WITH THE CHILDREN” [Proof 7], and about a half dozen more.

But that didn’t matter. The pedophile husband refused to obey any of them, and the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) at Cayuga refused to enforce them [Proof 8]. They felt it might "disadvantage" the pedophile husband. Seriously.

The OPP had the entire file. They were the ones who objected to the pedophile husband being released from the psychiatric facility in the first place. Their ongoing negligence meant the pedophile husband had a green light to sexualize and abuse the girls. The relationship between the pedophile husband and the OPP is something that requires some serious investigation.

PHOTOGRAPHS OF CHILDREN

The pedophile husband enjoys taking photographs and videos of young children who are not his, especially at his parent’s pool. He positions himself at specific places, at specific angles, and instructs them to jump in specific ways. This makes it much easier for him to get photographs of their chests, inner thighs, bottoms and other private areas [Proof 9].

Sometimes he posts these images on Facebook; however, we have reason to believe that the pedophile husband has a large collection of these images on his home computer. Superdad and the girls have made complaints to the police and formally written to Facebook asking them to remove the images. Neither have bothered to take any action.

Some of the images we managed to find are of the little girl known as “the third sister.” This girl, who we will not identify, was a close friend to the girls. They spent a lot of time together and really enjoyed each other’s company [Proof 10]; however, one day, the third sister abruptly stopped coming over. She turned away when she saw the girls. She no longer went on trips, participated in outings, etc. The pedophile husband was reported to have been acting “weird … kinda cringe” in the weeks leading up to her departure.

This was all reported to the Office of the Children's Lawyer (OCL). Her name and the report of potential abuse never even made it into their case notes.

SEXUAL ABUSE

The pedophile husband sexually abused the girls. It happened more than once and the biological mother knew exactly what was going on. Those little girls cried out to her for help. Once, she stood in the doorway and watched, as illustrated in a sketch by "1 of 2" [Proof 11]. The biological mother denied it. She blamed the girls. Accused them of lying. Called them all sorts of horrible names.

The girls’ testimony was validated by the chief child psychologists of the French Supreme Court [Proof 12] [Proof 13]. In Europe, unlike Canada, children have the right to be heard [Insert A,B at End of Presentation] and not just shoved along like inconvenient piles of DNA.

DEATH THREATS

The pedophile husband was put in for an emergency psychiatric assessment. He told the psychiatrist that he wanted to kill Superdad. Finally, we caught a glimpse at the barrage of medication the pedophile husband is taking, and the fact that medical staff are deeply concerned about his state of mind. So much so that they are recommending even more antipsychotic medications for him [Proof 14].

Not only did the pedophile husband utter threats against Superdad, but in another incident he told police he wanted to cut the fingers off of Nana and hang her [Proof 15]. Police (OPP) laid no charges.

FIREARMS

The pedophile husband is prohibited from firearms, but that doesn’t stop him from having guns, training on them at his favourite range, and using targets that clearly represent the girls. He even stores them in his barn because he knows the police will do nothing. He is so brazen that he often shares photos through his cell phone and even on Facebook [Proof 16] [Proof 17] [Proof 18 A, B, C, D, E] [Proof 19] [Proof 20] [Proof 21]. Complaints to police and firearms authorities led to nothing.

SEXUALIZING CHILDREN

The pedophile husband enjoys sexualizing children, and communicating sexual messages to children through children - e.g. pedophile husband caused his two sons to create a large sign inviting "2 of 2" to see their “GAME DICK,” etc. The boys held the sign and pedophile husband took a picture and sent it directly to "2 of 2" (age eleven) [Proof 22]. This was reported to the Niagara Regional Police. It was shuffled along and no action was taken [Proof 23].

THE GIRLS HAVE NO VOICE

The girls have never been heard in Canada. The Ontario Provincial Police had a brief conversation with them but cut it short after only a few minutes, drawing their own conclusions and writing a bullshit narrative. The Niagara Regional Police never met them, never spoke to them. Family and Children Services Niagara spoke with them for ten minutes. They have never appeared in a Canadian court. Never.

So they had to use social media to warn the public about their biological mother and her pedophile husband [Proof 24], but still, nobody in a position of authority would listen to them. Well, thanks to modern technology, the girls will have a voice [Proof 25 A,B,C,D].

INSERT A

C 364/14 EN - Official Journal of the European Communities 18.12.2000
CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (2000/C 364/01) - Article 24 - The Rights of the Child

1. Children shall have the right to such protection and care as is necessary for their well-being. They may express their views freely. Such views shall be taken into consideration on matters which concern them in accordance with their age and maturity.

2. In all actions relating to children, whether taken by public authorities or private institutions, the child’s best interests must be a primary consideration.

3. Every child shall have the right to maintain on a regular basis a personal relationship and direct contact with both his or her parents, unless that is contrary to his or her interests.

INSERT B

RIGHTS OF CHILDREN TO TESTIFY IN CANADA (NONE)

1. Judges will not usually allow minor children to take the witness stand in a trial. A consistent body of law reflects the view that it is not good for children to be drawn into parental conflict – and nothing says conflict like a trial.

2. As a rule, courts will only seriously entertain an application for a child to testify or have their own lawyer, if parents are thought to be incapable of presenting evidence of the children's views and evidence about their best interests.

HAVE YOU HEARD ENOUGH?

This is how you can help.

Please take a moment to give us your opinion on this presentation.  All responses are anonymous.  Help us improve our platform.